I've been running reiser3 for years and reiser4 for about a year. No problems on reiser3 and only minor issues on reiser4. Also many of my friends use reiserfs and I haven't heard very many reported problems. Sounds more like its on a user by user basis.
Jody Storme wrote: > Bob Finch wrote: > >> Actually this is hardly a surprise and your experience hardly unique. >> >> Hans Reiser himself does not feel his filesystem is anything other than >> experimental and prone to failure. He has said this many times concerning >> both the filesystem itself and the toolset for repair. Since he feels this >> way; it is easy to understand that his filesystem can be prone to failure >> in surprising and unexpected ways. >> >> Buyer beware applies here. >> >> >> Very best regards; >> >> Bob Finch >> > > I've also experienced huge problems with ReiserFS. After trying > ReiserFS, ext2/3, XFS and JFS I would say that ReiserFS is the very > worst of the lot... Personally I would recommend XFS - after using it > for two months now I've had no file system errors, even with lots of > systems hangs due to an overheating CPU. :( > > The only problem with XFS is that it's practically impossible to > undelete files... So be very careful of what you delete. > > In regards to startup / shutdown speeds, the best thing to do in my > opinion is make sure that you don't have any unnecessary processes > loading at startup. > > Jody Ribton > > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
