On Wednesday 19 April 2006 15:29, Attila wrote: > On Mittwoch, 19. April 2006 17:16 Joe GIles wrote: > > As a side note, I have a full gphoto.rules file, and I can see my camera > > in there. > > I have the same effect with an Canon A520 and digikam. And yes, my > gphoto.rules file was full too. > > > Its just I cant access it anymore since the move from libgphoto2-2.1.6. > > That is the reason from my view. On in the forum one said that digikam need > this version but sorry i haven't the link. > > > Any ideas where else I can look ? > > Save your gphoto.rules file, make your own package with the older version, > install it and look for differences in the gphoto.rules files. If it is not > too late take the files from /var/abs/extra/lib/libgphoto2. This works for > me. > > See you, Attila > > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
Well, I found the 2.1.6 package on my server that has been up for a while and I tried to install it. It installed ok, and I have some weird news. Digikam can now see my camera, but the permissions are still root:root on all the usb devices instead on one root:users or root:camera. Thus, Digikam fails to connect to it. So, I was wondering if it was a dbus/hal issue, so I downgraded dbus/hal, The problem with that is KDE barfed saying it could not load the media manager and Digikam didn't work either. Not sure what to think. Maybe an updated Digikam package? It works on Suse 10, so I can just use that, but I would sure like to get it resolved on my machine so I don't have to run upstairs everytime I want to pull pics off my camera. Anyone have any additional thoughts on this? Thanks!!! Joe _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
