On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 19:44:44 +0100 Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > > On Saturday 29 April 2006 7:43 pm, Tom K wrote: > > > >> Rohan Dhruva wrote: > >> > >>> On 4/29/06, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> to most non-upgraded pkgs, there is a reason, why they are not > >>>> updated yet! > >>>> > >>> And the reason for not upgrading python since a month is ? Lazy > >>> devs ? Because no app would break, like in case of openssl. > >>> > >> Are you serious, Rohan?! Do you really believe that slagging off > >> the devs is going to get the result that you want? > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> arch mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > >> > > > > I made packages for tk, tcl and now python. I also make the > > PKGBUILDs All in all, the archlinux packaging system seems > > brilliant. It's so much easier than rpm packaging or even deb > > packaging. My hat's off to the the person who created this > > packaging system! > > > > I do howerver have one question. Is it possible more than one > > package out of a tarball? This would help in modularizing KDE. > > > > > Yep, more than one package out of a tarball is possible.
I think he actually meant more than one package out of a PKGBUILD... you can make as many packages as you want out of a tarball, because no PKGBUILDs are linked together in any way. They wouldn't know the difference. Jason
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
