On Jun 1, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Michel Di Croci wrote: > Salut Benoît, > > That's not the way we act for the benefit of the french community. > Do you realize that right now there is two sites where you can > obtain the documentation, maintained by two groups of users? This > is completely ridiculous and it's not your or their fault, even if > it was created afterwards. If the two groups have worked together, > where would we be? There is an issue and we must find a way to > resolve it. Just stop thinking of what they have done to YOU btw, > what is important now is how you can act to resolve the issue? This > was bring to the archlinux ML because some people were tired of > having two choices of web sites. Some guys were rude in the > discussion about french guys and right now, you're giving a > justification for that. > > Please stop thinking like you have a choice right now, Leif will > come with a suggestion coming from a discussion (not a war) that > he think, should be followed by the two sides and that will resolve > the war and the duplicates. Don't you think it will be better that > way? No more personal attacks? No more IRC attack? I dunno what you > think but I know that if ArchLinux website points to the > ArchLinux.fr website, there is more chance that your site disappear > one day. But I don't want to be like that with you, I don't care > who win, except that right now, I know who is losting. > > Michel
If you can close your eyes on anything that these guys have done not on me but on all the french community, this your choice not mine. I'm working for the benefit of the french community ie not letting bad people do what they want when they want. They choose to divide the community, I didn't choose it nor acting in this sense. Now that users are divided, so I have to accept to compromised with these people. So when someone make pressure on you, you decide to pay him. That's a bad way to choose in any case. On the other hand I said, no mediator, they use a mediator. I made a proposal when they create their website and one other yesterday, no answer nor reaction from maintainers. That's not a way to start discussion. Do you really think some partnership could be done if 2 parts can't speak all together. Come on. So since a real discussion can't exist I will consider the discussion (that not started yet) as finished. Period. Benoit Chesneau. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
