On Jun 1, 2007, at 4:51 PM, James Rayner wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 01:39:52PM +0200, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> If you can close your eyes on anything that these guys have done not >> on me but on all >> the french community, this your choice not mine. I'm working for the >> benefit of the french community ie >> not letting bad people do what they want when they want. They choose >> to divide the community, >> I didn't choose it nor acting in this sense. > > Yes. Close your eyes to what they have done and forget about it. It's > the past. > > Discuss the issue here with them in public where nothing can be > hidden. > >> Now that users are divided, so I have to accept to compromised with >> these people. So when someone >> make pressure on you, you decide to pay him. That's a bad way to >> choose in any case. On the other >> hand I said, no mediator, they use a mediator. I made a proposal when >> they create their website and one other >> yesterday, no answer nor reaction from maintainers. That's not a way >> to start discussion. > > And what's wrong with an independent mediator? > >> Do you really think some partnership could be done if 2 parts can't >> speak all together. Come on. >> >> So since a real discussion can't exist I will consider the >> discussion (that not started yet) as finished. >> >> Period. > > Discussion will not happen, because you are choosing not to allow it. > > James
No, I choose real discussion but you can't understand that. A mediator is ridiculous. A partnership can't be based on such ridiculous method. I'm waiting answers. I'm waiting a real discussion between 2 parts. Benoit Chesneau. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
