On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:58:47PM +0200, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > I don't choose the mailing list first. Plus, If I have to say that > someone > is stupid I will say it.In public or not. I don't care if my words > are not kind or pleasant. > And if I look wrong because I tell to someone that is stupid, because > effectivly > he has done/said something stupid, I really don't care. These persons > can't > understand. > > But you are right this shouldn't happen on the mailing list. And for > me it's over, > I'm waiting for the date to the meeting on which they were agree 3 > hours ago. > No news yet. Comme c'est bizarre.
No, listen to them. Abusing people does not help your credibility, nor is it a reasonable form of discussion. If you disagree, say so _tactfully_. This flammable nature that we're seeing on the mailing list here, is going to hinder any attempt at negotiation or discussion. For a discussion to take place, both sides will need to concede their differences, approach with an open mind, open to change, and a calm attitude. Mediation was probably chosen because of the huge amount of emotional conflict between the two parties, and this is understandable. If you want to sort this out any other way, you're going to need to calm down and put the past in the past. Both parties. James _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
