You should not need to specify anything on the icon if the test below has a 
meaning, that is  it can say : "Set To: HTTP Header", as opposed to Property. 
See https://wso2.org/jira/browse/ESBJAVA-1811-  You need to cater for this 
enhancement in the ESB diagram design. 

+1 to make to have  a preference to toggle between icon+text vs. just icon.

Isabelle.
__________________________________________________

Isabelle Mauny
Director, Product Management; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
email: [email protected] - mobile (Spain) : +34 616050684 - mobile (Sri Lanka) 
+94 (0)774777663



On Aug 5, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Praveena Sarathchandra <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm +1 for using text below icons, because these are not like standard icons 
> that people are used to. Maybe you can let the user toggle the text on/off 
> using a shortcut key. Also, because the size of these icons are small, they 
> should not have any complex designs. You can have a look at Entypo[1] or 
> Fontawesome[2] icon fonts for some inspiration. 
> 
> Regarding the color scheme, I think it'd be better if you can follow a 
> pastel-like color scheme. Diagrams would look easy on the eye when there are 
> so many different kinds of elements in them. For this you can try Kuler[3] to 
> find one of your choice. 
> 
> [1] http://www.entypo.com/
> [2] http://fortawesome.github.com/Font-Awesome/
> [3] https://kuler.adobe.com/pastel-art-colors/
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Chanaka Jayasena <[email protected]> wrote:
> We had an internal discussion about the icons and designs. Plan is to get the 
> line art representation of the 1st and 4th concepts and draw the icons, 
> rather than using complex artwork. The icons will be grouped according to 
> what is used in ESB web console. These grouped icons will be differentiated 
> by the shape of the icon container, and the color of the icon.The text in the 
> icons will be kept since the repeating text below the icons should be the 
> description that the user is adding. Unfortunately my previous images does 
> not represent that idea. I am in the process of creating a  new screen to 
> visualize the proposed concept.
> 
> thanks,
> Chanaka
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[email protected]> wrote:
> So different colors is a good point as far as picking the difference goes. 
> But they got to be noticeably different. 
> 
> The good thing about concept one is the clear imaging in there. So we need a 
> combination of concept one and three where we could have clear imaging and 
> clear color based differentiation to help pick the right one to match the 
> need from the bunch of options available, while you are at the task of 
> developing.  
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Kasun Indrasiri <[email protected]> wrote:
> - We thought of including the text along with the icon, because all mediators 
> cannot be represented with just an icon. EIPs can be used for few mediators, 
> but not all mediators cannot be represented with EIP icons. And the text 
> below the icon can be anything (such as a comment) that user wants to add 
> (which will be saved as the sequence/mediation description in the config). 
> - I prefer the icon shape as with concept-3 with a different color scheme 
> (and with out fancy colored icons inside) 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Chanaka Jayasena <[email protected]> wrote:
> Designing meaningful Icons for "Fault mediator" , "Aggregate Mediator" can be 
> easy enough, but for complex synarios it will be hard to represent the idea 
> and grasp the idea from the icon as well. From the users perspective when 
> user tries to read a flow of elements, it will be easy for the user if there 
> is a word attached to it where he can read it on the spot rather than try to 
> find it by going through a documentation. I personally like the first one but 
> the third one is more color contrasting, which adds one more plus point for 
> the users to bind memories to associated color patterns of icons. One minus 
> point in the third one I see is that, the text representation is bit 
> inconsistent compared to the first one. 
> 
> thanks,
> Chanaka
> 
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Isuru Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[email protected]> wrote:
> Personally I don't like them .. they're going to be too complicated at the 
> 50x50 type size they're in reality. Second, the words in the icons don't make 
> sense IMO.
> Yes.
> I think the words are not needed on icons. We just have to make sure the icon 
> is meaningful.  
> Third the colors seem too strong? Of course I'm color blind so my color 
> choices are not one to bet on.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Isuru Perera
> 
> Senior Software Engineer | WSO2, Inc. | http://wso2.com/
> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
> 
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrishantha | LinkedIn: 
> http://lk.linkedin.com/in/chrishantha/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chanaka Jayasena
> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
> email: [email protected]; cell: +94 77 785 5565
> blog: http://chanaka3d.blogspot.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kasun Indrasiri
> Software Architect
> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
> lean.enterprise.middleware
> 
> cell: +94 71 536 4128
> Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Samisa...
> 
> Samisa Abeysinghe
> VP Engineering
> WSO2 Inc. 
> http://wso2.com
> http://wso2.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chanaka Jayasena
> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
> email: [email protected]; cell: +94 77 785 5565
> blog: http://chanaka3d.blogspot.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> 
> Praveena Sarathchandra,
> 
> Software Engineer,
> WSO2, Inc. 
> lean . enterprise . middleware 
> 
> praveena.me | +94718732203
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to