On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Jonathan Marsh <[email protected]> wrote:

> My initial impression was that it would be very difficult to comprehend
> and distinguish such a breadth of icons if they are all the same shape and
> color scheme, and differ only in the interior graphics which are pretty
> tiny in all cases.
>
>
>
> So +1 to a limited number of categories to help classify different basic
> types, and representing them in different colors and/or shapes.
>

+1, we need to categorize, also why do we stick to square type icons and
try to put everything into that ? Why not have icons with different shapes
(of cause meaningful shapes), like funnels, pipes etc, so collectively it
will make much more scene.


>
>
> Also, for the complexity of these icons, why are we trying to squeeze them
> into such a tiny space?  Can you really tell at a glance what each of these
> steps and the whole sequence are trying to accomplish?
>
>
>
> There are some other very cool ways we could push this to the next level,
> for instance place the icons on a isometric 3d (ala sim-city) type grid, or
> have the flows represented by arcs instead of simple linear arrows, or
> adding steps causes an animated restructuring of the flow similar to what
> you see in https://code.google.com/p/gource/, or having icons grow as you
> hover over them like the mac launcher bar…
>

+1, on hover zooming the icon is a standard practice, we can even stick a
tool tip on hover, which will add more context.

Regards,
/Nuwan


>
>
> -Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Srinath Perera
> *Sent:* Monday, August 05, 2013 3:37 AM
> *To:* architecture
> *Subject:* Re: [Architecture] Developer-Studio Icons
>
>
>
> I prefer Concept 4, basically to draw the idea in EIP icon style (simple
> lines, but too detail picture).
>
>
>
> Kasun, Chanaka and myself was chatting. I think we need to group icons by
> type (e.g. filters, conditions, transform, do external call ). We can use
> the same grouping we have in palettes, and then all icons have same look
> and feel.
>
>
>
> Some thoughts on concepts
>
>
>
> Log, BAM - stethoscope
>
> Aggregation, Clone, Iterate - EIP aggregator Icon, EIP splitter Icon, EIP
> splitter Icon,
>
> Event - EIP pub/sub icon
>
> Drop, router - EIP  routing diagram
>
> Filter - funnel
>
> Header, Property
>
> OAuth, Entitlement
>
> XSLT, PayloadFactory, Smook
>
> Class, Command - "{java}"
>
> Call, Callout - EIP request, replay Icon
>
> router - EIP Icon
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>


-- 
*Thanks & Regards,

Nuwan Bandara
Technical Lead; **WSO2 Inc. *
*lean . enterprise . middleware |  http://wso2.com *
*blog : http://nuwanbando.com; email: [email protected]; phone: +94 11 763 9629
*
<http://www.nuwanbando.com/>
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to