On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Prabath Siriwardena <[email protected]>wrote:
> How do we handle SAML2 sessions now..? > > I believe we keep it in-memory.. > > Keep this in-memory won't scale - as these sessions suppose to live long.. > and also won't be accessed frequently.. > > Can we use an LRU cache - and persist the SAML2 sessions..? > Should this be persisted? Isn't replicating the session across a cluster enough? Should SAML2 sessions be supported for a lengthy periods? Encountered similar logic for Thrift sessions & persistence added some unnecessary overhead IMO. > Thoughts please.. > > Thanks & Regards, > Prabath > > Mobile : +94 71 809 6732 > > http://blog.facilelogin.com > http://RampartFAQ.com > > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > > -- /sumedha b : bit.ly/sumedha
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
