On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Prabath Siriwardena <[email protected]>wrote:
> How do we handle SAML2 sessions now..? > > I believe we keep it in-memory.. > > Keep this in-memory won't scale - as these sessions suppose to live long.. > and also won't be accessed frequently.. > > Can we use an LRU cache - and persist the SAML2 sessions..? > > Thoughts please.. > +1. we need to persist it and also it can be replicated among cluster nodes using hazelcast caching. AFAIK older versions, it has been replicated using state replication mechanism in axis2. I guess, we can fix this for next release? I could see that there are some issues, already reported regarding this.. Thanks, Asela. > > Thanks & Regards, > Prabath > > Mobile : +94 71 809 6732 > > http://blog.facilelogin.com > http://RampartFAQ.com > > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > > -- Thanks & Regards, Asela ATL Mobile : +94 777 625 933
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
