On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Prabath Siriwardena <[email protected]>wrote:
> Yes.. SAML2 sessions can go as long as for a week even.. > Then persistence definitely makes sense. > Thanks & regards, > -Prabath > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Sumedha Rubasinghe <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Prabath Siriwardena >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> How do we handle SAML2 sessions now..? >>> >>> I believe we keep it in-memory.. >>> >>> Keep this in-memory won't scale - as these sessions suppose to live >>> long.. and also won't be accessed frequently.. >>> >>> Can we use an LRU cache - and persist the SAML2 sessions..? >>> >> >> Should this be persisted? Isn't replicating the session across a cluster >> enough? Should SAML2 sessions be supported for a lengthy periods? >> Encountered similar logic for Thrift sessions & persistence added some >> unnecessary overhead IMO. >> >> >>> Thoughts please.. >>> >>> Thanks & Regards, >>> Prabath >>> >>> Mobile : +94 71 809 6732 >>> >>> http://blog.facilelogin.com >>> http://RampartFAQ.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Architecture mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> /sumedha >> b : bit.ly/sumedha >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Architecture mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture >> >> > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Prabath > > Mobile : +94 71 809 6732 > > http://blog.facilelogin.com > http://RampartFAQ.com > > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > >
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
