On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Asela Pathberiya <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Prabath Siriwardena <[email protected]>wrote: > >> How do we handle SAML2 sessions now..? >> >> I believe we keep it in-memory.. >> >> Keep this in-memory won't scale - as these sessions suppose to live >> long.. and also won't be accessed frequently.. >> >> Can we use an LRU cache - and persist the SAML2 sessions..? >> > >> Thoughts please.. >> > > +1. we need to persist it and also it can be replicated among cluster > nodes using hazelcast caching. AFAIK older versions, it has been > replicated using state replication mechanism in axis2. I guess, we can fix > this for next release? I could see that there are some issues, already > reported regarding this.. > +1 > > Thanks, > Asela. > > >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> Prabath >> >> Mobile : +94 71 809 6732 >> >> http://blog.facilelogin.com >> http://RampartFAQ.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Architecture mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture >> >> > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Asela > > ATL > Mobile : +94 777 625 933 > -- Thanks & Regards, *Johann Dilantha Nallathamby* Senior Software Engineer Integration Technologies Team WSO2, Inc. lean.enterprise.middleware Mobile - *+94777776950* Blog - *http://nallaa.wordpress.com*
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
