On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Ramith Jayasinghe <[email protected]> wrote:

> are we going to take into account the whole migration effort ( for
> existing users) and the possible learning curve?
>

​There is no migration required. It is a new product major version and new
platform version. And we are talking about product configs not artefacts
​

>
> I think we should review what exactly configurations we have (in each
> product) and how it will look in Yaml/Json? ( - and such a conversion would
> that lead to better user experience or just mess things up?)
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Thilina Piyasundara <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> IMO its better to move out from XML. But Yaml and Json have its own
>> disadvantages as well. In yaml you can mess the hole thing if you miss a
>> single space/tab. In json you can't comment out a configuration block. Its
>> better to have a UI to configure and save those configs in a yaml or json
>> format specially when we have to deal with lots of configuration files.
>>
>> By the way, windows systems and python programs use a configuration
>> format called ini which is an old way of storing configurations using name
>> value pares with sections [1].
>>
>> 1. http://www.fcla.edu/z3950/everglades.html
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>>
>> Thilina Piyasundara
>> Systems Engineer
>> ​
>> ​
>> Blog: thilina.piyasundara.org
>> Linkedin: linkedin.com/in/thilinapiyasundara
>>
>> WSO2, Inc.
>> ​
>> ​ <http://wso2.com/>
>> lean . enterprise . middleware
>> https://cloud.wso2.com
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Paul Fremantle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree. I downloaded the MSS and C5 distros and I found the XML configs
>>> made them seem a little outdated.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> On 10 November 2015 at 18:06, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I brought up this idea a few years ago as well and it got shot down,
>>>> and I thought of bringing this back again. More and more, we are starting
>>>> to notice that the world is moving or has moved from verbose XML based
>>>> configuration to more concise YAML based configuration. So IMO, from C5
>>>> based products onwards we have to move to YAML based config.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Azeez
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Afkham Azeez*
>>>> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>*
>>>> *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>
>>>> * cell: +94 77 3320919 <%2B94%2077%203320919>blog: *
>>>> *http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>
>>>> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*
>>>> <http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
>>>> *linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>*
>>>>
>>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Paul Fremantle
>>> Co-Founder, WSO2
>>>
>>> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>>> twitter.com/pzfreo
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Architecture mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ramith Jayasinghe
> Technical Lead
> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com
> lean.enterprise.middleware
>
> E: [email protected]
> P: +94 777542851
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to