On Oct 5, 2013, at 3:53 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:55 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: >> Since June 2013, there have been 52 requests that would not have >> been approved under the new policy because these organizations >> had only some equipment in a data center in the ARIN region, but >> either all or most of their technical infrastructure outside of the region >> and most or all of their customers outside of the ARIN region. >> >> Total amount of space issued to these 52 organizations: 9,672 /24s, >> (which is a bit more than a /11 in total) and nearly all organizations were >> based in the APNIC region. > > Hi John, > > I notice from Frank Bulk's thread that ARIN has instituted a change in > procedure for address allocation related to in-region use. Were the > new procedures in place, how would that have impacted the 52 requests > you reference?
Bill - ARIN's procedures for requesters has not changed since the Policy Implementation and Experience Report addressing this topic (at the ARIN 31 meeting in Bridgetown); hence, the 52 requests would still be processed. As noted earlier to Frank, I believe that the text sent in response should be reviewed, and we will do so upon the disposition of Draft Policy 2013-6, regardless of outcome. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
