-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 12:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] support for 2014-1 (out of region use)
Scott: >> So are you in favor of or opposed to 2014-1 Andrew S.: >I'm opposed to it, because I just don't buy that it will actually solve >any problem. The existing policy neither forbids nor denies out of >region use. This proposal tries to codify things, but I don't see why that's >necessary. > In other words, I guess I don't really believe the problem statement. > I suppose if I did, 2014-1 is all right. Color me confused. Wearing my AC shepherd hat, and trying to keep track of opposition/support for this proposal, I saw you "agree very strongly" with David Farmer's assertion that > As the problem statement says, I think the real problem is that policy > is ambiguous on the subject of out of region use. Which means there > are some in the community that think out of region use is outside the > rules, as you seem to think. Then others think it is perfectly normal > and has always been allowed, because its never been disallowed in > policy. I think we need to clarify that out of region use was always > intended to be allowed by policy. Let me repeat Scott's question in a different way: David Farmer says "we need to clarify that our of region use was always intended to be allowed by policy" and you agreed very strongly with him, and 2014-1 does that. Are you still maintaining that you are opposed to 2014-1? _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
