On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 05:55:18PM +0000, Milton L Mueller wrote: > > Let me repeat Scott's question in a different way: David Farmer says "we need > to clarify that our of region use was always intended to be allowed by > policy" and you agreed very strongly with him, and 2014-1 does that. Are you > still maintaining that you are opposed to 2014-1? >
I should have trimmed that last sentence, actually. (I apologise for being so careless. I'm unusually obtuse today, which is saying something). The main thing that I wanted to agree with was that the historic policies were ambiguous and that anyone who thinks they're going to fix that with a lot of tight controls is mistaken, so we have to live with the consequences. To me, this new proposal is worse than doing nothing. I prefer it over previously-floated alternatives (which seemed to me to be attempting to create a new policy that was never there). So, if a policy is going to be adopted, I can stand this, but I don't think any policy is actually needed here. Best regards, Andrew -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
