On May 21, 2014, at 6:30 PM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote: > > The problem this proposal intended to fix was with the staff, not the > researchers.
<http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2014-March/028104.html> "Going forward, ARIN will not issue routing authorization that covers any address space issued to others without community-developed policy that specifically directs us to do so. " <http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2014-March/028117.html> "NRPM 11 was designed for parties requesting allocations from ARIN for research purposes; not ARIN checking the quality/integrity of new block received from IANA. Given the recent occurance, I believe it is prudent for ARIN to utilize NRPM 11 going forward for purposes of this quality checking, as it makes visible the organization doing the testing/making use of the space, including duration of the activity and research nature, as well as reaffirming the expected uniqueness requirement." > This proposal is a no op. Who was held accountable? Who will be held > accountable if it happens again? I am accountable to the community and its elected Board for compliance. > I suggest the intent of the policy is good enough. Clarity in number resource policy is always helpful in alignment with community expectation and compliance to same. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
