The existence of Legacy holders makes that a murky legal question and thus is
probably not feasible. However, I would support attempting something like that
if it was voluntary. We might be surprised by the amount of cooperation if it
was voluntary and some sort of amnesty was offered.
Steven Ryerse
President
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338
770.656.1460 - Cell
770.399.9099- Office
℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc.
Conquering Complex Networks℠
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Buhrmaster [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 2:47 PM
To: Steven Ryerse
Cc: McTim; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] About needs basis in 8.3 transfers
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Steven Ryerse <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Even one transfer that doesn't update the database is one too many
Playing devils advocate then, I take it you are in favor of moving to rescind
(and then re-issue) any IP Numbers for which the whois validation has not been
confirmed (by the yearly POC validation emails)? And perhaps with an officer
attestation saying that the numbers of fully utilized per RSA?
Historically, the ARIN community has never been willing to take that step (and,
I would likely not support it), but perhaps the tides have changed, and
community now believes that whois accuracy is the most important thing.
I will look forward to your policy proposal to put teeth into whois validation.
Gary
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
