On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Steven Ryerse <[email protected]> wrote: > Even one transfer that doesn't update the database is one too many
Playing devils advocate then, I take it you are in favor of moving to rescind (and then re-issue) any IP Numbers for which the whois validation has not been confirmed (by the yearly POC validation emails)? And perhaps with an officer attestation saying that the numbers of fully utilized per RSA? Historically, the ARIN community has never been willing to take that step (and, I would likely not support it), but perhaps the tides have changed, and community now believes that whois accuracy is the most important thing. I will look forward to your policy proposal to put teeth into whois validation. Gary _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
