On Jul 17, 2014, at 08:35 , Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think it will have exactly the opposite effect, actually. I think it >> lowers the barrier for smaller entities and new entrants while keeping >> roughly the same effective requirements for larger incumbents. > > Maybe if you can show how the barriers are reduced for smaller entities > and new entrants, vs how they will be affected if the larger entities > are enabled to get the remaining space faster? > > >>> I think we need another idea to come up.. >> >> Such as? > > Hopefully the question will be answered, and the quicker we move on, > maybe the quicker that will be answered. > > > > How about support for removing the needs test for small transfers a la > 2014-14? > It seems to benefit those whose needs are small, but who are having > difficulties with justification due to niggling IPv4 policy issues like > minimum sizes and utilization requirements. > Others have noted we are rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic with > these IPv4 policy issues. > Maybe it is time to metaphorically sweep those chairs into the sea so we can > move on.
At the moment, that seems to me like the implementation of a small-tax. Owen _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
