On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
| Maybe it is time to metaphorically sweep those chairs into the sea so we can move on. You mean like give exactly one /24 to each person who posts to this thread until there are none left? I think the last time that was proposed a lot of people posted to the thread but most said "I oppose, but if this does pass, consider me in line for a /24". Maybe the community feels different now? Personally, I think it is increasingly more important to provide stewardship and ensure IP addresses go to those that need it as the resource becomes more scarce and more costly. __Jason On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think it will have exactly the opposite effect, actually. I think it >> lowers the barrier for smaller entities and new entrants while keeping >> roughly the same effective requirements for larger incumbents. >> > > Maybe if you can show how the barriers are reduced for smaller entities > and new entrants, vs how they will be affected if the larger entities > are enabled to get the remaining space faster? > > > I think we need another idea to come up.. >>> >> >> Such as? >> > > Hopefully the question will be answered, and the quicker we move on, > maybe the quicker that will be answered. > > > > How about support for removing the needs test for small transfers a la > 2014-14? > It seems to benefit those whose needs are small, but who are having > difficulties with justification due to niggling IPv4 policy issues like > minimum sizes and utilization requirements. > Others have noted we are rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic with > these IPv4 policy issues. > Maybe it is time to metaphorically sweep those chairs into the sea so we > can move on. > > Regards, > Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > -- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|[email protected]|571-266-0006
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
