Hi John,
My biggest argument against this is that this encourages abusive
squandering of IP space, in order to get more. Especially for anyone
who wants to own as much as possible 'real estate'.
Ie an operator can use this as a vehicle, say they get a /16. Their
mandate is then to fill it up as fast as possible. So they 'rent' space
to anyone they can, eg affiliate email marketers, or any use that can
sneak by being recognized as 'used'.
Hit 80% aggregate and you get more, rent it out... (it doesn't even
matter if it is done profitably, that isn't the goal here)
With diminishing IP Space, if there was some way to set standards on
what usage qualifies on 80% usage, I could get behind it.
But we are already seeing what appears to be this activity amongst
hosters ("..get it used, I don't care what for..")
I know, I can't think of a way to set those standards that the community
can get behind, so I am sure ARIN can't ;)
All I am saying, is that anything that encourages or allows for the
larger players to 'land grab' isnt' in the best interests of the
community either.
I think that this will encourage the incumbants, at the expense of new
entrants, and those looking to 'land grab' more than the existing
policies, and thus I am against this policy change.
However, we don't want to disadvantage someone just because they have
been successful either.
I think we need another idea to come up..
Jeffrey -
For sake of argument, imagine a large ISP which over the course of
time has
ended up with a /8, two /16, and a /14 IPv4 blocks (with the /14
being the most
recently issued block because of nearly full utilization of all prior
blocks at the
time.)
Under present policy, the ISP cannot request address space until they
have
brought the utilization of the most recently issued block (the /14)
up to 80%.
Under the proposed policy, the ISP is immediately eligible to request
space,
since their aggregate utilization (even with a completely unused /14)
is going
to be very high (potentially as much as 97% due to the fully-used /8
block.)
The proposed policy allows organizations to request space so long as
their
aggregate utilization is higher than 80%, and this means many existing
organization with large IPv4 holdings will suddenly qualify to
receive an
additional allocation if they choose to request it. Whether that is
desirable
or not is a matter for the community to decide.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
