On 12/18/14, 9:11, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Steven Ryerse
<[email protected]> wrote:
All of those stats are interesting but they are not what is important here.
What is important is how many small Orgs that applied for the minimum
allocation (as it was defined at the time of the allocation request) since ARIN
was chartered were denied because of needs policy.
I don’t know what that number is but if it is greater than zero, it shouldn’t
have happened! ARIN’s Mission is to Advance the Internet, not to stifle it.
While there is clearly support by some for your
position advocating needless number allocations,
the majority of the community supports a review
to insure that the allocations are actually advancing
the Internet, and not just throwing numbers around
to whomever asks, whatever their plans (or lack
thereof).
Planning is hard and I don't like the rules. Not give me /16's right now
my innovation will be stifled and I'm gonna tell!
~Seth
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
