Obviously you are entitled to your opinion and I respect it, but I don’t share
it.
Market price is driven by supply and demand and there is actually quite a
supply of IPv4 resources out there in the huge amount of Legacy blocks that
were issued before ARIN existed. If this community would fully embrace the
transfers of these blocks in a way that encouraged, instead of discouraged,
bringing those into the ARIN sphere - I think there would be so many blocks
become available, the price would go way way down because of oversupply.
I know John will tell us that ARIN already has a mechanism for that built into
current policy and that some Legacy blocks have become available thru that
policy, but the fact that a large number of transactions continue to completely
go around ARIN is indication that those Legacy holders do not want to abide by
current ARIN policy.
So this community can refuse to make the changes to policy that would make
these resources available above board on the open market, or it can continue to
refuse to change and watch prices continue to rise until only big Orgs can
afford them. At some point IPv6 might be the solution but until then IPv4
resources continues to be required. I think it is about time for this community
to truly embrace the Legacy holders and I hope others come to that conclusion
as well. Maybe we need IPv4 Amnesty. My two cents.
Steven Ryerse
President
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338
770.656.1460 - Cell
770.399.9099- Office
[Description: Description: Eclipse Networks Logo_small.png]℠ Eclipse Networks,
Inc.
Conquering Complex Networks℠
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Stephen Sprunk
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
On 25-Sep-15 14:05, Steven Ryerse wrote:
> It’s pretty obvious that if needs testing goes away, Legacy blocks will
> become much more available to anyone who needs them, ...
If so, only because it allows speculators to drive up the market price, which
is not in the interests of those who actually need resources.
> When any small Organization requesting a very small amount of
> resources is completely denied resources because of arbitrary
> “policy”,
ARIN policy is not arbitrary, and it's set by the community; if you see a
problem with how needs testing is done, feel free to suggest changes.
If your complaint is actually that the minimum block size is not small enough,
that is an entirely different problem from needs testing.
S
--
Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
