On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If the ASN gets legitimately issued to someone else and the squatter > proceeds to hijack it from the legitimate registrant they should be turned > off if the ISP is going to do the right thing according to whois. > > ~Seth > If you forgot to pay your bill and ARIN reissues your ASN, it's a matter of perspective who the hijacker is. I'm not saying it's OK to not pay your bill, but how punitive should we be asking ARIN staff to be? Especially, if ARIN staff has every reason to believe the organization using the ASN is the original registrant? And if we the internet routing community are not will to be the bad guys and stop routing it after ARIN staff signals us by removing it from the registry. When what are we really expecting? We're not being very forthright, if we ask ARIN staff to break things that we the internet routing community are not will to break ourselves. Do we really need to recycle these ASN bad enough to cause intentional breakage? Then we need to stop using them in the internet routing system! -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:[email protected] Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
