On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:24 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 4:17 PM, Bill Buhler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the clarification John, > > > > So I understand you, regarding IPv4 you are recycling the deadbeat > resources already. > > > > My impression though is that you aren’t doing the same with 2-byte ASN? > I think it would be good policy to begin reclamation of those resources. > > We are recycling ASN’s that are returned - after the hold period we > confirm that > they’re not in active routing and then will reissue if someone makes an > explicit > request for a 2-byte ASN. > If a 2-byte ASN comes available and no one immediately requests an explicit 2-byte ASN, will you reissue the 2-byte ASN to the next non-explicit ASN requester (who presumably would be just as happy with a 4-byte ASN), or do you keep the 2-byte ASN in inventory until the next explicit 2-byte ASN request? -Scott
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
