> Michael Peddemors wrote : > I personally dont' think ARIN's role should involve anything > that can be construed as 'forcing' IPv6 adoption. While it > might run counter to popular opinion, the idea of policies that > encourage the 'killing' of IPv4 usage goes against the grain. > Policies can 'encourage' more people supporting IPv6, but > making policies that make it mandatory have real world > implications to holders of IPv4 space, that I think run > contrary to ARIN's role to service those incumbants.
Strongly agreed. Michel. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
