I actually hope too that it is not required, but I made the point to show
that the game playing could be caught.
Also, many are looking at the IPv6 policy as affecting everyone. It does
NOT. It will ONLY affect those who receive directed IPv4 transfers. If
you have an IPv4 network that is not growing, and you are happy with its
operation, you will still be free to ignore IPv6.
However, the more places we can get to adopt IPv6, the better it is for
everyone. We know the IPv4 math does not work, and eventually the only
IPv4 players are going to be those who are grandfathered, or are willing
to pay a large premium to another player to obtain their address space,
since there is no new space.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Alan Batie wrote:
On 11/11/19 4:51 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Then I guess we need to make the IPv6 connectivity an ongoing obligation
to keep the additional IPv4 blocks, rather than a one shot test during
transfer to eliminate the game playing.
Even I'm not ready to go that far yet, although I can sympathize...
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
