As a registry it has full rights to establish the policies the community
find to work better for the region in a well defined and established
process. Among its rights are to define the requirements for something
related to registration to happen as for example transfers.
Regards
Fernando
On 11/11/2019 22:16, Scott Leibrand wrote:
Agreed. If you want a meaningful use requirement, legislate a meaningful use
requirement. Tie it to free money, as with EHRs and FHIR, or figure out some
legislative authority to mandate it. ARIN isn’t a legislative authority:
they’re a registry, whose job it is to keep track of who’s using what numbers.
Scott
On Nov 11, 2019, at 4:56 PM, Alan Batie <[email protected]> wrote:
On 11/11/19 4:51 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Then I guess we need to make the IPv6 connectivity an ongoing obligation
to keep the additional IPv4 blocks, rather than a one shot test during
transfer to eliminate the game playing.
Even I'm not ready to go that far yet, although I can sympathize...
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
