Ah, of course! My apologies. The answer to that is: 26 organizations would be reinstated if this policy went through.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 9:32 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alyssa, > > Good to speak with you. Perhaps I mispoke... how many organizations were > removed from the waitlist and are still seeking larger allocations? If > my understanding of the original issue appears unclear, please enlighten > me! > > I am trying to determine if orgs other than the petitioner were > effected; if so, how many, and what effect that would have on ARIN's > related inventory of addresses allocatable via the waitlist (not including > 4.10s, etc.). > > Thanks, > Scott > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, Alyssa Moore wrote: > > > Hi Scott, > > > > Anita Nikolich (AC member) answered this on Dec 16: > > > > >Please note (and you can refer to the Nov AC minutes) that organizations > > that are currently on the waitlist won’t be affected, because the next > > disbursement of v4 would fulfill all the exempted orgs as well as the > ones > > remaining on the list. The overall impact to the current waitlist is > > non-existent from these requests. > > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 9:21 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > In these deliberations, I think it would be useful to know how > > many actual > > ARIN Member Organizations would be effected. I am not talking > > about > > downstream customers, affiliates, or the like, but only resource > > holders > > on the actual waitlist. Does John Sweeting have any metrics as > > to this? > > Further, if all effected organizations were to receive the > > allocations > > they are seeking, what percentage of the available address > > inventory would > > be immediately exhausted? > > > > Thanks, > > Scott > > > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, John Curran wrote: > > > > > On 14 Jan 2021, at 11:00 AM, Michael B. Williams > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > How does ARIN analyze the response from this? Is there > > weight > > > given only to ARIN member organizations or any > > organization? If > > > anyone is given consideration, what is to stop people > > from > > > lobbying individuals and other organizations to send an > > email to > > > support their agenda? For example, I could very easily > > find 500 > > > people to respond to this email saying they do not > > support the > > > policy. If I were a malicious actor trying to influence > > policy > > > discussion and were to offer some sort of incentive for > > those to > > > reply I could easily have thousands of organizations > > supporting > > > this policy one way or another. > > > > > > My feelings would be the majority of the weight should be > > given to > > > ARIN member organizations voices as part of the tallying > > process. If > > > that is the case, perhaps we should ask those organizations to > > include > > > their ARIN org id? > > > > > > > > > Michael - > > > > > > The ARIN Policy Development Process specifies the petition > > appeal process, > > > and the sole criteria for a successful petition is expressions > > of support > > > from at least 25 different people from 25 different > > organizations. > > > > > > Note that a successful petition simply means that the policy – > > without any > > > recommendation of adoption from the ARIN Advisory Council – > > will be sent to > > > the ARIN Board of Trustees for their consideration of possible > > adoption. > > > Also note that for the purpose of determining petition > > success, ARIN staff > > > will only be counting those messages which clearly indicate > > support for the > > > petition and include both the submitters name and their > > organization. > > > > > > The ARIN Board is on the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List, and > > will see any > > > discussion of substantial merits or concerns with the policy. > > Each trustee > > > is free to weight such input as they see fit, but at this > > point it is not a > > > numerical question – as we are not seeking a poll of support > > or opposition > > > to the policy – but rather simply whether at least 25 > > organizations feel > > > (despite the ARIN AC’s decision not to recommend) that policy > > warrants > > > consideration by the ARIN Board of Trustees. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > /John > > > > > > John Curran > > > President and CEO > > > American Registry for Internet Numbers > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > ARIN-PPML > > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
