Hello list,
I received the explanation for my exclusion from this year's AC slate.
For those who believe this explanation provides any transparency, I post it in
its totality below to disabuse them of that notion.
Required explanations don't move the needle at all in attempting to improve the
nominations process.
Perhaps all it would take would be a simple change to the charging language to
instruct the nomcom not to exclude candidates who are qualified and include
those minimum qualifications?
Regards,
Mike
Dear Mr. Burns,
The ARIN Nomination Committee (NomCom) is in receipt of your request for an
explanatory statement on the reasons why you were not included on the Advisory
Council candidate slate for the 2021 ARIN Elections. The ARIN NomCom reviewed
all duly submitted and timely nominations and the materials provided by the
nominees. The NomCom’s robust deliberation process was informed by the
diversity of perspectives and experience among NomCom Members and strong
adherence to the mandate and terms of reference.
Various factors were considered including, but not limited to, experience,
involvement in the ARIN community, and responses to the nominee questionnaires.
After careful and thoughtful review of each nominee, it was decided to not put
your Advisory Council nomination forward onto the initial slate of candidates
this year.
Catherine Middleton
Chair, ARIN Nomination Committee 2021
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
