+1 If any organization can justify the need for a /16, should be able to get it.
Even I will say, if any organization can justify, for example, a /12 (I doubt it), should be able to get it. Limiting IPv6 deployments is a non-sense. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet > El 12 ago 2024, a las 23:33, David Farmer via ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> > escribió: > > /16 is a reasonable limit; keep the current NRPM. One /16 allocation in > nearly a decade does not concern me. /16 allocations were intended to be rare > but possible; in fact, I believe the policy is functioning as intended. If we > see several additional /16 allocations in the next couple of years, I could > be convinced to reconsider my position. But at this point, I think this > policy is premature. > > Thanks > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 2:12 PM Elizabeth Goodson > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Hello PPML, >> >> As lead shepherd on ARIN-2024-8, I'm reaching out for additional feedback >> from the community on this policy following the robust discussion here in >> June. >> >> The previous discussion did not come to a clear community consensus with >> opinions falling in multiple categories (in no particular order): >> - /20 is a reasonable limit, support the Draft Policy as written >> - /16 is a reasonable limit, keep current NRPM >> - Allow initial allocations above a certain size that are not on a nibble >> boundary (e.g. /19, /18, /17) >> - Add clarification about what designs would not justify a certain size >> initial allocation (e.g. 6RD) >> >> Questions for the community: >> - Do you support the draft policy as written? >> - If not, can the policy be changed so you would support it? What change(s) >> do you support? >> - Should the community continue to work on the policy or abandon it? >> >> Thanks, >> Liz Goodson >> >> =============== >> Problem Statement: >> In order to promote aggregation, the NRPM currently allows initial >> allocations up to a /16. However, the entire IPv6 address space only >> contains 65536 /16s, and the space allocated to IANA for globally routable >> purposes only contains 8192 /16s. Therefore, a /16 is a sufficiently large >> portion of the IPv6 address space that the goal of conservation starts to >> outweigh the goal of aggregation. >> >> Policy Statement: >> 6.5.2.1b: Replace "In no case shall an ISP receive more than a /16 initial >> allocation." with "In no case shall a LIR receive more than a /20 initial >> allocation." >> ================== >> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you experience any >> issues. > > > -- > =============================================== > David Farmer Email:[email protected] > <mailto:email%[email protected]> > Networking & Telecommunication Services > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 > =============================================== > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
