I'm with David. And if I remember right, there was already a discussion related to this months ago.
The key for a policy is to have a problem statement. While this policy says that the "problem" is the allocations of huge chunks of IPs, it's not a real problem because those "huge chunks" are not allocated as often. I understand that we're trying to future-proof here, but a single in a blue moon allocation only shows that the existing policy is working fine. As in, it required and was very critical to justification for such a huge block. So it's not really a problem - it did what it was designed to do, instead of just giving /16 to anyone who asks without asking them any questions. On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 04:33:54PM -0500, David Farmer via ARIN-PPML wrote: > /16 is a reasonable limit; keep the current NRPM. One /16 allocation in > nearly a decade does not concern me. /16 allocations were intended to be > rare but possible; in fact, I believe the policy is functioning as > intended. If we see several additional /16 allocations in the next couple > of years, I could be convinced to reconsider my position. But at this > point, I think this policy is premature. -- Roman V Tatarnikov | https://linkedin.com/in/rtatarnikov
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
