If in practice no organizations can justify that size of block I don't think restricting is pramature really. And no one can. At least doesn't give any ideas to one that may think about creating a unexistant need.
Fernando On Tue, 13 Aug 2024, 05:26 jordi.palet--- via ARIN-PPML, <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > If any organization can justify the need for a /16, should be able to get > it. > > Even I will say, if any organization can justify, for example, a /12 (I > doubt it), should be able to get it. > > Limiting IPv6 deployments is a non-sense. > > Regards, > Jordi > > @jordipalet > > > El 12 ago 2024, a las 23:33, David Farmer via ARIN-PPML < > [email protected]> escribió: > > /16 is a reasonable limit; keep the current NRPM. One /16 allocation in > nearly a decade does not concern me. /16 allocations were intended to be > rare but possible; in fact, I believe the policy is functioning as > intended. If we see several additional /16 allocations in the next couple > of years, I could be convinced to reconsider my position. But at this > point, I think this policy is premature. > > Thanks > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 2:12 PM Elizabeth Goodson < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello PPML, >> >> As lead shepherd on ARIN-2024-8, I'm reaching out for additional feedback >> from the community on this policy following the robust discussion here in >> June. >> >> The previous discussion did not come to a clear community consensus with >> opinions falling in multiple categories (in no particular order): >> - /20 is a reasonable limit, support the Draft Policy as written >> - /16 is a reasonable limit, keep current NRPM >> - Allow initial allocations above a certain size that are not on a nibble >> boundary (e.g. /19, /18, /17) >> - Add clarification about what designs would not justify a certain size >> initial allocation (e.g. 6RD) >> >> Questions for the community: >> - Do you support the draft policy as written? >> - If not, can the policy be changed so you would support it? What >> change(s) do you support? >> - Should the community continue to work on the policy or abandon it? >> >> Thanks, >> Liz Goodson >> >> =============== >> Problem Statement: >> In order to promote aggregation, the NRPM currently allows initial >> allocations up to a /16. However, the entire IPv6 address space only >> contains 65536 /16s, and the space allocated to IANA for globally routable >> purposes only contains 8192 /16s. Therefore, a /16 is a sufficiently large >> portion of the IPv6 address space that the goal of conservation starts to >> outweigh the goal of aggregation. >> >> Policy Statement: >> 6.5.2.1b: Replace "In no case shall an ISP receive more than a /16 >> initial allocation." with "In no case shall a LIR receive more than a /20 >> initial allocation." >> ================== >> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> > > > -- > =============================================== > David Farmer Email:[email protected] > Networking & Telecommunication Services > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/2218+University+Ave+SE?entry=gmail&source=g> > Phone: 612-626-0815 > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 > =============================================== > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of > the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or > use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this > communication and delete it. > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
