On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 3:10 PM Gerry George <[email protected]> wrote: > Just for clarity, are you considering that there may not be a need for > shorter than /20 (which the evaluation exercise may determine or inform)?
Yes, but divide that into two questions: 1. Can a justifiable need under current policy for an IPv6 /19 be constructed? 2. Subjectively, as evaluated by the community, does a justifiable need for a /19 exist? I'm confident the answer to #1 is yes. I suspect the answer to #2 is no. #2 can't be directly written as policy, it's subjective, but policy's job is to produce results which meet #2's expectations. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
