On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 12:12 PM Elizabeth Goodson <[email protected]> wrote: > As lead shepherd on ARIN-2024-8, I'm reaching out for additional feedback > from the community on this policy following the robust discussion here in > June. > > The previous discussion did not come to a clear community consensus with > opinions falling in multiple categories (in no particular order): > - /20 is a reasonable limit, support the Draft Policy as written > - /16 is a reasonable limit, keep current NRPM
I continue to struggle to imagine a not-grossly-wasteful justification for a single organization to require more than a /20 of IPv6 address space. Doubly so for an *initial* allocation where the registrant does not have long expertise with IPv6. > Policy Statement: > 6.5.2.1b: Replace "In no case shall an ISP receive more than a /16 initial > allocation." with "In no case shall a LIR receive more than a /20 initial > allocation." I support the proposed policy as written. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
