Hello Bill
I see your goodwill to find a solution to this topic, but the reality is
that there aren't, simply because there is not enough recovery to
fulfill de waiting list. Waiting list is not a solution that makes
appear new IPv4 and will not solve much problems during this very scarce
IPv4 exhaustion scenario.
I think forcing people to receive smaller blocks than the bare minimal
may cause undesirable situations, unfairness and at the end waiting list
may keep its rate regardless. If it moves fast it would encourage more
organizations to sit on it.
What I think is worth doing is remove any organizations sitting in the
waiting list that have blocks already and allocate only to those who
have nothing.
I can't understand the concern some have to secure the position to those
who are there as if it was an 'acquired right'. As far as I know sitting
in the waiting list never gave any guarantees to anyone that they would
receive a block and for sad that situation is that will not happen for
most given the scenario. It is necessary the rules to change and I see
no problem at all to remove these organizations who never ended up
receiving anything so far as there are enough justifications for that.
Removing all these organization who already have some space can make it
a lot more effective and create more fairness to give those who have
nothing a chance to start and move the waiting list with more effectiveness.
Fernando
On 07/10/2024 15:54, William Herrin wrote:
With less than a 6-month backlog, eligible
organizations can receive up to a /22. More than 6 months and it drops
to /23. More than 12 months and it drops to /24. These restrictions
apply only to requests added to the wait list after the policy's adoption.
How about it, folks? Can we get consensus around this concept?
Essentially it'd become effective in about two years and serve to
manage the duration of the waitlist by reducing the amount allocated
when it grows long. And of course, everyone who needs more addresses
or needs them sooner has the option to go to the market and pay.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
