On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 12:10 PM Gerry E.. George <[email protected]> wrote: > We are now seeing 4 feasible options for this Draft Policy: > 1. Consider revised policy as written (with proposed retroactive protections > - still 3+-year lag and wait times); > 2. Consider policy without any retroactive protections (reduction in wait > times by ⅔s); > 3. Do away with the Waitlist completely (new policy would be required); > 4. Abandon the policy (essentially, do nothing, no changes to current > operations)
Howdy, I like option 1. The current state of the waitlist is unreasonable. It's obvious to me that we don't have consensus for option 2. If we get a bright idea in option 3's space, it can supplant anything we do now with option 1. If we do nothing then in three years the state of the waitlist will still be unreasonable. And will still be years away from being reasonable. So I support option 1. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
