On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 12:10 PM Gerry E.. George <[email protected]> wrote: > We are now seeing 4 feasible options for this Draft Policy: > 1. Consider revised policy as written (with proposed retroactive protections > - still 3+-year lag and wait times); > 2. Consider policy without any retroactive protections (reduction in wait > times by ⅔s); > 3. Do away with the Waitlist completely (new policy would be required); > 4. Abandon the policy (essentially, do nothing, no changes to current > operations)
One thing I'd like to point out: Options 2 and 3 are not mutually exclusive with option 1. We can adopt option 1 and continue discussing modification to requests currently in the queue. If those discussions prove fruitless, adopting option 1 will still leave us with a solution 3 years out. We can adopt option 1 and continue discussing elimination of the waitlist. Even if we do not find a better alternative to the waitlist, it will at least become more functional in 3 years time. Only option 4 conflicts with option 1, leaving us with zero progress on the problem that the waitlist is just too darn long. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
