On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:14 AM, mike.v...@gmail.com <mike.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I found quite some room. See attachments. Red: Easy improvement. yep, all those will be covered by flood-fill: no need to do them manually. wiggles3_mv, the HXT0 and HXT1 GND segment on the left middle, that one i got. but near IPSOUT, top left, in wiggles_mv? no. it means moving those IPSOUT vias, and i'm not doing that. am i. can i yes. am i going to... mmmmm..... *strains*.... okayokay you twisted my arm :) > Yellow questionable but could use some improvement. Excuse the crappy > image editor it's all I have at the moment. i _like_ crappy editors, i use them all the time :) as long as it gets the job done and it doesn't take long, communicates the intent, *why* would you spend $600 and hours of time?? :) > Also wouldn't a GND infill on the signal layers be preferable? As log > not unconnected islands emerge. GND infill *is* going to be done on the signal layers. but the copper-to-track clearance is 10mil (where tracks are 5mil). so what happens is: any space smaller than 10mil does *not* get flood-filled. so i put little "leaders" - like you can see - into the areas where the beer cannot reach. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ab6dJYDgj48 l. _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk
