>I would not like to use dirty words but this line of thought could take >you directly to some kind of racism. That's why your question is just >stupid. But you probably know it. It sounds as though you are saying one of two things: 1. The belief that race is important is, by definition, racism, *whether or not it is true.* Hence it is stupid to consider that possibility, since there is a risk that the evidence will support it, leaving you with the choice between racism and self-delusion. 2. The belief that race is important is known to be false with such confidence that considering the alternative is a waste of time, hence stupid. Which of those describes your position? Or is there a third alternative I have missed? -- David Friedman Professor of Law Santa Clara University [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daviddfriedman.com/
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race John Cunningham
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Maria Pia Paganelli
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Fred Foldvary
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Bryan D Caplan
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race fabio guillermo rojas
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david mitchinson
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Robin Hanson
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david friedman
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david friedman
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Richard . Eichmann
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Girard
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david friedman
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david friedman
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Ole J. Rogeberg
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race Fred Foldvary
- Re: Growth, Wealth, and Race david friedman
