I would personally lean back on the monitoring problems -- for a particular "save the child" fund, three of my friends saved the same child, same photo, bio, everything. And I would like to say it was the Shriner's that got in trouble not so long ago for having rather lude behavior with paid tabletop dancers at one of their "charity banquets," and are in trouble for mistreatment of their circus animals besides. (Needless to say, they have very high administrative costs.)

At 03:44 PM 6/5/2003 -0400, you wrote:
These are two separate things.  We can imagine the public good of "a
functional Africa" that will suffer from the traditional public goods
problems.  But, I don't think that you can say the same for the plethora
of "save the children" type charities that assure you that a child's life
will be saved for your $20/mth.  The benefits from that are largely
internalized -- the donor gets to feel better about himself for having
saved the life, etc.  The contribution to any public good is next to nil
-- the continent remains disfunctional and there is still rampant
starvation and war.  But, the donor has personally made one person better
off who wouldn't likely have been made better off absent the
contribution.  Don't think we can invoke public goods here.





Reply via email to