128kbps is for those who just want to listen to the songs, and do not care about the quality. You can pretty easily spot the difference between 128 and 320kbps songs. The only minor problem with higher bitrates is the higher filesizes. No other problems!
sai --- In [email protected], "Mathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For MP3 format Microsoft recomends to use 128KBS only. Try to rip an > audio CD with Windows Media Player 11. You don't need to go for more > than 128KBS of encoding for MP3 format. > > -Mathan Raj A > Microsoft Tech support. > > --- In [email protected], "noorulwahid" <noorulwahid@> > wrote: > > > > > > I think 320kbps CBR (Constant bitrate) which is the highest level > of > > encoding mp3s, is good for the casual audiophile. For hardcore > > audiophiles, I rhink you should do what our members have said ie. > aac > > etc. > > --- In [email protected], naushad ali <nashlib@> wrote: > > > > > > Hey > > > I have a pod/iPhone so all I do is extract the cd as wav and let > > iTunes do the rest for me. Crystal sound. I have almost the entire > a > > r r collection with album art et al.no regrets. > > > Nash > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > On May 30, 2008, at 1:45 PM, "nivensamy" <nivensamy@> wrote: > > > > > > Hello friends, > > > > > > Im sure 99% of us must have a portable ditigal player, be it an > > ipod, > > > creative, microsoft, sansa etc... which lack a cd player. > > > My question is which best encoding can we use to retain all the > > sound > > > quality from the audio cd. FLAC and WAVPACK, APE etc are not the > > norm > > > on portable players.... so we are left with lossy mp3, wma etc... > > > Technically, we can make a choice just by comparison of these > > > encoders, but nothing is better than our ears and experience from > > > listening to rahman's CDs. So any recommendations based on > > experience? > > > How do u listen to rahman songs without the audio disc??? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Niven > > > > > >
