Rawat,
Your quote "Didn't he know that period movies are
all vocal, loud, exhibitionist."

ARR is one hell of a thinker - & keeps trying to do things differently..

whatever be the case, saying that AG-ARR combo is not good is ridiculous..
AG knows exactly what a musical movie is all about & ARR loves those kind of
directors.

And JA Music, BGM were awesome !!! to say the least.

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 4:09 AM, V S Rawat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>   On 7/19/2008 8:58 AM India Time, _Chord_ wrote:
>
> > ARR himself mentioned how proud he was of his work
> > in JA in interviews. Why would he lie? To be politically correct?
>
> That is when I get sickened to the core when such shallow type of
> understanding people go with.
>
> I said "Music and films went on different directions. Music was personal
> sort of and film was public exhibitionist sort of."
>
> So, ARR can rightly proud of his work as an MD who gave good music.
>
> And ARR should realize that he failed to get the feel of the
> exhibitionist nature of the film and made personal genre of music for it.
>
> I wonder how ARR could mess it up. Didn't he know that period movies are
> all vocal, loud, exhibitionist.
>
> I am surprised to find that "The feel of JA music didn't suit the tone
> of JA movie" is being mentioned in this list for the first time by me.
> It has been 6 months when the music was released and then the movie was
> released. Almost all memebers must have heard the music many times and
> seen the movie at least once. And after 2000 or 5000 posts that you all
> talked about on JA movie/ music, not a single person can see that movie
> is going in a different direction than where the film was going?
>
> That is an indication of current quality of discussions this group. Just
> praise ARR, just exchange trivia and tidbit.
>
> > Please. The audiences loved the music and I can safely say that 9/10
> > families who I know from various parts of India say that the music of
> > JA is heavy in their listening rotation even today and say that it's
> > one of the best albums in bollywood recently. Sales don't lie either
> > as this album has done very well commercially.
>
> People loved Om Shanti Om and its music trillion times more than they
> loved JA movie or music. That doesn't set OSO music any shade better
> than JA music. I liked 2-3 songs of OSO also somewhat, but they are
> miles behind the level of ARR's music.
>
> Let us not judge the quality of ARR's music by the curves on sales
> charts. People are stupid because the best works of ARR - 1947 Earth,
> Water, etc. were commercially flop.
>
> > ARR purposely wanted to
> > create an album that sounded different from Mughal E Azam,
>
> I can believe that. He is always hellbent on doing something different.
> :-) And I like that. That is his identity, his essence.
>
> > a type of
> > musical direction that has not been footprinted on with this type of
> > movie.
>
> I can believe this too.
>
> And he succeeded.
>
> JA music vs movie is a unique combo that was never there in any period
> movie.
>
> but it failed. soft music got lost in the loud, gaudy movie.
>
> > If he came up with a "Pyar Kiya To Darna Kya", he would be
> > accused of trying to copy that song or suck up to the music of that
> > time.
>
> Your argument was going perfectly well and acceptable, but you punctured
> it right here by stooping to the level of saying that what i wrote was a
> suggestion that ARR steals Mughal-e-azam songs to reuse in JA.
>
> You are very shallow. I should not have bothered reading your mails nor
> replying to you.
>
> so i stop here.
>
> >
> > Love live JA's music. It's one of my all time favorites. Your
> > opinion is your opinion, but it's part of a very, very small minority.
>
> --
> V
>
>  
>



-- 
Cheers,
Pradeepan.

"All you need to do is, decide what to do with the time that is given to you
!"

Reply via email to