What exactly needed is courage to accept one's faults and respect others views, which Rawat doesn't even seem to be aware of. .
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Spiritual strength is the need of the hour, to read such mails... What > else. We cant start fighting all the time here ... > > I seriously get the doubt, that some one has hacked V.S. Rawat 's id, and > sending all these mails.. Or is Rawat going through tough times... ( Sorrry. > No Offense meant ) > > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 1:39 PM, V S Rawat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 7/19/2008 8:58 AM India Time, _Chord_ wrote: >> >> > ARR himself mentioned how proud he was of his work >> > in JA in interviews. Why would he lie? To be politically correct? >> >> That is when I get sickened to the core when such shallow type of >> understanding people go with. >> >> I said "Music and films went on different directions. Music was personal >> sort of and film was public exhibitionist sort of." >> >> So, ARR can rightly proud of his work as an MD who gave good music. >> >> And ARR should realize that he failed to get the feel of the >> exhibitionist nature of the film and made personal genre of music for it. >> >> I wonder how ARR could mess it up. Didn't he know that period movies are >> all vocal, loud, exhibitionist. >> >> I am surprised to find that "The feel of JA music didn't suit the tone >> of JA movie" is being mentioned in this list for the first time by me. >> It has been 6 months when the music was released and then the movie was >> released. Almost all memebers must have heard the music many times and >> seen the movie at least once. And after 2000 or 5000 posts that you all >> talked about on JA movie/ music, not a single person can see that movie >> is going in a different direction than where the film was going? >> >> That is an indication of current quality of discussions this group. Just >> praise ARR, just exchange trivia and tidbit. >> >> > Please. The audiences loved the music and I can safely say that 9/10 >> > families who I know from various parts of India say that the music of >> > JA is heavy in their listening rotation even today and say that it's >> > one of the best albums in bollywood recently. Sales don't lie either >> > as this album has done very well commercially. >> >> People loved Om Shanti Om and its music trillion times more than they >> loved JA movie or music. That doesn't set OSO music any shade better >> than JA music. I liked 2-3 songs of OSO also somewhat, but they are >> miles behind the level of ARR's music. >> >> Let us not judge the quality of ARR's music by the curves on sales >> charts. People are stupid because the best works of ARR - 1947 Earth, >> Water, etc. were commercially flop. >> >> > ARR purposely wanted to >> > create an album that sounded different from Mughal E Azam, >> >> I can believe that. He is always hellbent on doing something different. >> :-) And I like that. That is his identity, his essence. >> >> > a type of >> > musical direction that has not been footprinted on with this type of >> > movie. >> >> I can believe this too. >> >> And he succeeded. >> >> JA music vs movie is a unique combo that was never there in any period >> movie. >> >> but it failed. soft music got lost in the loud, gaudy movie. >> >> > If he came up with a "Pyar Kiya To Darna Kya", he would be >> > accused of trying to copy that song or suck up to the music of that >> > time. >> >> Your argument was going perfectly well and acceptable, but you punctured >> it right here by stooping to the level of saying that what i wrote was a >> suggestion that ARR steals Mughal-e-azam songs to reuse in JA. >> >> You are very shallow. I should not have bothered reading your mails nor >> replying to you. >> >> so i stop here. >> >> > >> > Love live JA's music. It's one of my all time favorites. Your >> > opinion is your opinion, but it's part of a very, very small minority. >> >> -- >> V >> >> > > > -- > regards, > Vithur > > ARR -- The Sweet Cube always > >
