No offense chord, i have very expensive stuff here but the audio still doesnt feel all great. The points you mention are all true, but something about the quaility is a lil messy. I know we are so picky but delhi 6 was slightly better. This is only in terms oif audio quailty, not the songs which are obviosuly awesome.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:25 PM, ichord <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This is not a backlash against what the previous poster said, but more so a > declaration of my strong feelings. And in case AR himself reads our messages > and feels hurt and disappointed by the previous headline about how the sound > quality sounded bad, I want AR to know that I LOVE THE AUDIO AND SOUND > QUALITY OF THIS CD!!! > > Here are the reasons why I love the sound quality in Blue > > - Sound texture and timbre is bright, glossy, crystal clear > - Arrangements are very thickly layered and intricate > - Despite thickness of arrangements, tracks are well separated with > distinguishable sound from each, not muddled or one big mass of noise > - Great balance between electronic sounds and real instruments > - Nice balance between bass and treble with good mid range > > Now, to fully appreciate Blue's sound quality and audio strengths, you > really need a good system to hear it. If you play blue on cheap speakers > through a lap top or through only cassettes, you are not going to be able to > fully appreciate the intricacy of the arrangements and in fact, some of the > most thickly layered sections may sound noisy and tangled. > > >
