You metioned that which was really my point, Chris - the usability of menus
that large.  The burden of the user experience balanced with the need for
reporting criteria is often the main point of contention, isn't it?  And the
users usually lose that one.
 
Rick 
  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of strauss
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 7:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: How do others handle CTI and Assignment requests?


** 
Not really, considering the number of separate teams and users they have -
all of whom probably have their own reporting requirements and unique items
to support. When I search Categorizations, we have almost 3700 CTI for over
25 support areas (colleges, departments, separate campuses) and over 80
support groups but only 300 licensed users (ITSM 5.5.1). It is one of the
reasons we are going to use multi-tenancy to try to give every IT support
organization their own company in ITSM 7 - so that they can have (and
manage) their own CTI independently of each other. We may still end up with
over 3000 CTI, but people will only see a much smaller subset any any point
in time. We are still experimenting with ITSM 7 configuration to see how
well this will _really_ work.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Remedy Database Administrator
University of North Texas Computing Center
http://remedy.unt.edu/helpdesk/ 

 

  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 8:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: How do others handle CTI and Assignment requests?


** 
FOUR THOUSAND CTIs?  Does that seem large to anyone else?  If so, I would
make a note to look at cutting that down some on your migration to ITSM 7.
The use of product-based CTIs will help with that, so that you can keep your
problem ones generic - and more manageable.
 
More to your question, I don't think that CTIs should be borne of customer
requests.  They should be a required part of adding support to a new group
and/or application.
 
Rick 
  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hardy, Patrick
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: How do others handle CTI and Assignment requests?


** 
Good morning all!
 
This is more of a process question on how others out there handle these
types of requests.  Here's a brief description of our environment and how we
handle it today.  
 
We have a "Remedy Group", that consists of myself, 2 Help Desk supervisors
and our manager.  We have HD as well as 3 other homegrown apps running, with
HD being the most utilized (also very customized).  There are 150 support
teams defined with 800 users supporting roughly 4000 CTI combinations across
the apps.  The HD CTI structure is not directly bound to anything else,
although it is utilized as the structure for several other areas, Change
Mgmt, IS Support Portfolio, proprietary Account Mgmt tool.  Our current
process to have a CTI created/modified, or an assignment change made is just
a simple word template that gets sent to us for review and adjustment before
being implemented.
 
I have been tinkering with a solution but would really like to know how
others are doing this to give me some ideas.  Any and all input is much
appreciated!
 
 
ARS - 6.3
HD - 6
SLA - 6
SQL - 2K
Server - W2K
(FYI, we are preparing to go to 7.x and utilizing CMDB)
 
Patrick Hardy 
479-290-5767
 
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee,
then you have received this email in error and any use, dissemination,
forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.
Please notify us immediately of your unintended receipt by reply and then
delete this email and your reply. Tyson Foods, Inc. and its subsidiaries and
affiliates will not be held liable to any person resulting from the
unintended or unauthorized use of any information contained in this email or
as a result of any additions or deletions of information originally
contained in this email.

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML
in it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___ 

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to