Also, please check if other applications are behaving in this manner.  
Hopefully this will not sound like I'm pointing fingers, but I have seen 
several comments within Microsoft blogs that indicate that the DST patch for 
Windows encounters this issue - namely that the DST "fix" is not year 
dependant, so that data from previous years picks up the DST schedule for 2007.
 
See:
 
http://www.jnbridge.com/blog/?p=23
 
"There's a very interesting problem with Microsoft's DST patch for Windows that 
you should be aware of, since it can impact date conversion results when mapped 
date proxies are used.  The patch applies the new rules for whether date and 
time are daylight savings time without regard to year.  This means that if you 
ask .NET whether a given DateTime in the past is DST, it will apply the new 
rules even if the date would have been standard time under the old rules." 

and

http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2007/02/05/1606868.aspx
 
"Apparently we were naïve, as now historic times are calculated incorrectly due 
to Windows inability to calculate the correct DST times from previous years, 
including 2006!  You can try it for yourself, by changing the system clock to 
March 13th 2006 on a Windows XP machine (or 2000 machine with manual registry 
patch as suggested in KB914387).  Vista gets it right, but as that represents < 
0.1% of our install base it's not much consolation at the moment."
 
Again, I'm not saying that this is the case, but it's something to test for - 
namely whether the issue you are seeing was caused by the AR System patch or 
happened when you loaded the OS and/or Java patches.   Since AR System in 
general uses the Operating System for DST information except for the Mid-Tier, 
web services and import/export; DST 2007 issues seen in other parts of AR 
System are potentially linked to the DST changes in the Operating System itself.
 
Thanks,
 
-David J. Easter
Sr. Product Manager, Service Management Business Unit
 
BMC Software, Inc.
 
________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 12:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 6.3 Patch 20 - Issues with years prior to 2007


** 
Just to check ...
 
On the AIX box you have
 - The AIX DST patches applied
 - The updated Java
 - The ARS server patch
 
On the Windows box you have
 - The Microsoft DST patches applied
 - The updated Java
 - The ARS Mid-Tier patch
 
 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Eric Cleereman (IT)
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 2:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: 6.3 Patch 20 - Issues with years prior to 2007


** 

Hi All, 

I'm running version 6.3 of ARServer under Oracle 9 on AIX, and version 6.3 of 
Mid-Tier on Windows 2000 in my development environment.  I've just installed 
Patch 20 for both, and am in the process of doing some preliminary testing.

Remedy seems to be applying the revised schedule for 2007 for earlier years as 
well.  For example, it seems to be seeing March 20th 2007 as Eastern Daylight 
Time (EDT), which is correct.  But it seems to see March 20th 2006 as EDT as 
well.  In 2006 EDT did not go into effect until April 2nd, so it should see 
that date as Eastern Standard Time (EDT).

This is an issue for us, as we do a lot of historical reporting. 

Has anyone else running 6.3 Patch 20 (or 7.1 Patch 1) noticed any problems with 
Daylight Saving time calculations for 2006 or prior years?

Eric Cleereman 

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to