> Was it all internal to BMC submissions?
 
No - but it was a lot of folks that provide products or services - rather than 
actual end customers.  We were hoping to get more submissions from folks who 
were users of the products - not just consultants, partners, independent 
developers and such.  For example, a case study presentation - with the 
customer profiled in the case study doing the presentation and thus available 
for questions from other customers interested in implementing similar solutions.
 
Thanks,
 
-David J. Easter
Sr. Product Manager, Service Management Business Unit
BMC Software, Inc.
 
The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in this 
E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.  My voluntary 
participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a spokesperson, 
liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, Inc.
________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 8:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: BUW 2007 Track Sessions Announced


** 

Of course BMC originally announced a delayed decision on papers

because of the huge response.

 

Was it all internal to BMC submissions?

 

.... Daniel

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Easter, David
Sent: July 19, 2007 7:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: BUW 2007 Track Sessions Announced

 

> I, too, was disappointed with the dearth of non-BMC presenters. 

 

We too were disappointed in the number of customer submissions.  If anyone 
missed the submission deadline but has a desire to present, please feel free to 
send me a direct E-mail with your topic and synopsis.  We still have some 
ability to move things around to accommodate customer presentations.  It 
doesn't necessarily have to be a development training session - we'd love to 
have customers present their honest (but hopefully positive) experience with 
BMC products too!

 

Thanks,

 

-David J. Easter

Sr. Product Manager, Service Management Business Unit

BMC Software, Inc.

 

The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in this 
E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.  My voluntary 
participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a spokesperson, 
liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, Inc.

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: BUW 2007 Track Sessions Announced

** 

I, too, was disappointed with the dearth of non-BMC presenters.  I think the 
submission time was far earlier than it had been in years past - that may have 
had a bit to do with it.

 

Rick
 

On 7/19/07, Bill Estep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

** I didn't see any development sessions.  They are all BMC product related.  
Did anyone see anything that's not BMC product related, but Remedy development? 

Thanks, we're still trying to decide if we are sending folks. 

Bill Estep
Nemours 

 

On 7/18/07, Geoffrey Endresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: 

** For some reason it's not on the list

I want the session called "Remedy Licenses for Dummies" with tips and tricks to 
using the minimum amount of floating licenses while staying within the License 
Agreement. 

-Geoff 

 

On 7/18/07, Jarl Grøneng < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 
wrote: 

Pretty much the same, but also
AR System Plug-in Server 7.1 and Java SDK and AR System 7.1 API enhancements 

-
Jarl


On 7/17/07, Jon Chau < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  > wrote:
> ** https://bmcuserworld.com/catalog/catalog/catalog.jsp
> 
> What are some of the topics that most interest you?
>
> I'm interested in:
>
> The Definitive Pure Java Single Sign On Integration of Remedy Web 
> Making DVF Development Easier: A High-Level API and a Case Study
> Taking Advantage of New Features in AR System Server 7.1
>
> Jon
>  __20060125_______________________This posting was
> submitted with HTML in it___

-- 
-Geoff Endresen
Amazon.com <http://amazon.com/>  __20060125_______________________This posting 
was submitted with HTML in it___ 

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to