On 7.0.1 they at least have an index though its not unique but yes go ahead and 
modify it to be a unique index. It will help more than hurt, in fact I can't 
think of why it may ever hurt..

Regards
 
Joe D'Souza
Remedy Developer / Consultant,
IBM Global Technology Services,
Chicago.



----- Original Message ----
From: Niklas Asplund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 4:35:08 AM
Subject: Re: Number of users in User form

** 
Thanks Joe for the advice.
It sounds like a good idea to add a unique index there.
 
BTW. I'm running ARS 7.0.1 
 
// Niklas

 
On 29/01/2008, Joe DeSouza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
** 
Niklas,
 
While I agree with the others that there should not be a performance problem, I 
would strongly advise to modify the index of the Login Name field to be a 
unique index.
 
I have come across problems where there exists 2 or more records for the same 
user in the user form due to the absense of workflow on the User form to 
prevent duplicate Login Names. It happened to this customer during import of a 
set of users directly to the user form..
 
You haven't specified what version of the ARS.. One of the earlier viersio and 
the versions downward, didn't even have an index on the Login Name field - 
leave alone a unique index.. Make sure you have one..
 
Cheers
 
Joe D'Souza
Remedy Developer / Consultant,
IBM Global Technology Services,
Chicago.



----- Original Message ----
From: Carey Matthew Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 7:06:29 AM
Subject: Re: Number of users in User form

Niklas,

The phrase "during ARS password changes and other such User form updates"  can 
be described as any data value in the User for was what I saw as "slower then 
before". ('Email Address', 'Password', 'Default Notify Mechanism', 'Group 
List', 'License Type', 'Full Text License Type', 'Login Name', etc...)

Again... I believe that was due to slowness of my RDBMS and not necessarily due 
to ARS slowness.

I however would also expect the RAM requirement for the ARS server and for some 
secondary subsystems (like the Email Engine) to increase too. Those components 
keep this data cached so they would be affected by such a growth in the data.

And if you are still using a per v7 Mid-Tier then I think it would also be 
affected due to the way it caches objects based on 'Group List' combination 
too. (However, I have not tested it for performance or RAM growth. But that is 
my expectations.)

-- 
Carey Matthew Black
Remedy Skilled Professional (RSP)
ARS = Action Request System(Remedy)

Love, then teach
Solution = People + Process + Tools
Fast, Accurate, Cheap.... Pick two.


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to